Client Background
The client is a tier-1 automotive component manufacturer supplying
to leading OEMs across North America and Europe. With a complex global supply
chain and a wide range of direct material inputs, the client faced growing
pressure to optimize sourcing decisions without compromising on quality or
compliance. Their procurement team had historically relied on
legacy vendor relationships and internal cost benchmarks but was now seeking a
more data-backed, agile approach to sourcing.
Challenges They Faced
Despite operating at scale, the client struggled with few critical
sourcing challenges:
- Fluctuations
in the prices of metals and synthetic components created instability in
procurement budgets across quarters.
- The
client was dependent on multi-region suppliers but lacked access to actual
cost breakdowns, making it difficult to assess margin fairness or
renegotiate effectively.
- With
70% of direct material sourcing tied to long-standing suppliers, the
procurement team had limited leverage and minimal exposure to emerging or
cost-efficient alternatives.
- There
were no updated internal benchmarks to compare supplier quotes against
real-time market rates, weakening the client’s negotiation power.
These challenges were directly impacting both sourcing efficiency
and profitability, prompting the client to seek data-backed procurement
intelligence.
Approach
TraceData deployed a structured, three-phase methodology designed
to discover cost inefficiencies and enhance supplier negotiations:
- Supplier
Cost Benchmarking Across Five Countries: We mapped supplier pricing
structures for the client’s top 10 high-spend direct material categories,
across India, Vietnam, Thailand, Mexico, and Poland. This included metals,
melded components, and engineered parts. Our team analysed:
- Per-unit
cost variance across geographies
- Input-to-output
cost ratios for equivalent SKUs
- Historical
pricing trends to identify supplier margin inflations
2. Should-Cost
Modelling for Top 5 Components: Using granular cost modelling, we
broke down each part’s fair market price by factoring in:
- Raw
material prices (sourced from global commodities databases)
- Labor
rates by country
- Overhead
and logistics assumptions (based on factory audit data)
3. Vendor
Re-Evaluation & Negotiation Support: We
presented our findings during supplier negotiation rounds and supported the
client in:
- Re-aligning
contracts with four legacy vendors
- Onboarding
two new suppliers from Southeast Asia with better cost-to-quality ratios
- Designing
KPI-based contracts focused on delivery timelines and price indexing
Check
How TraceData Strategic Procurement Research Helps Businesses Save Costs and
Reduce Risk
Outcome
The sourcing transformation delivered measurable results within a
single quarter:
- Through
vendor rationalization and should-cost renegotiations, the client achieved
an average savings of 14% across high-spend categories.
- By
shifting to regionally aligned suppliers with consistent output quality,
the average delivery timeline dropped from 35 days to 23 days.
- Should-cost
models are now used internally by the client’s procurement team as a
negotiation baseline and budgeting tool.
- By
introducing clear benchmarking and KPI tracking, supplier performance
improved across reliability, responsiveness, and adherence to
service-level agreements.
Client Testimonials
"Partnering with TraceData gave us a
strategic edge in supplier negotiations. Their rigorous market analysis and
cost modeling exposed inefficiencies we had previously overlooked.”
- Chief
Procurement Officer, Global Automotive Firm
Contact Us: -
TraceData Research
+91 9266849840
Comments
Post a Comment